Webpage adjusted for smaller screen width.
Rhetoric
Within Pattern Analysis, rhetoric is the persuasive portion of a literary unit based on its structure. Certain locations within each literary unit are potentially persuasive–they are presented below for the sake of analysis. Normally, many of the potential locations can be persuasive, but often not all. The student is encouraged to listen to what the Holy Spirit seems to be emphasizing.
Like the imperfect chiastic structures, imperfect parallel symmetries can also have a high impact upon a reader. When an element has been inserted, omitted, transposed to another location, or substantially varied, that then is an imperfect parallel symmetry. This makes the structure look less than totally symmetric. An additional emphasis should be found in an imperfect parallel symmetry at the place of asymmetry.
A strongly worded directive or command that conveys the importance of doing something. In English, Hebrew and Greek, the imperative is a verb. In Greek, the spelling of the word indicates it is imperative. In English, imperatives are usually the first word in a sentence or phrase. For example, the phrase in Deuteronomy 30:19C which states, "Choose life in order that you may live, you and your descendants," is an imperative. Context is important in determining if an imperative statement is emphatic.
In a parallel symmetry, these are the two A elements, A-B-C-A'-B'-C'. Sometimes these are a place of emphasis.
A strongly worded directive or command that conveys the importance of doing something. In English, Hebrew and Greek, the imperative is a verb. In Greek, the spelling of the word indicates it is imperative. In English, imperatives are usually the first word in a sentence or phrase. For example, the phrase in Deuteronomy 30:19C which states, "Choose life in order that you may live, you and your descendants," is an imperative. Context is important in determining if an imperative statement is emphatic.
Also known as conjugate pairs. It is any two elements that are paired with each other. In some cases, the pair may be emphatic even though they are not in a position of emphasis such as first/first or first/last. For example, in a chiastic A-B-C-X-C'-B'-A' structure, the two B elements might add considerable conviction to the reader or listener.
A strongly worded directive or command that conveys the importance of doing something. In English, Hebrew and Greek, the imperative is a verb. In Greek, the spelling of the word indicates it is imperative. In English, imperatives are usually the first word in a sentence or phrase. For example, the phrase in Deuteronomy 30:19C which states, "Choose life in order that you may live, you and your descendants," is an imperative. Context is important in determining if an imperative statement is emphatic.
In a parallel symmetry, this is oftentimes a place of emphasis. For example, in an A-B-C-D-A'-B'-C'-D' structure, the two D elements are in the last/last position.
A strongly worded directive or command that conveys the importance of doing something. In English, Hebrew and Greek, the imperative is a verb. In Greek, the spelling of the word indicates it is imperative. In English, imperatives are usually the first word in a sentence or phrase. For example, the phrase in Deuteronomy 30:19C which states, "Choose life in order that you may live, you and your descendants," is an imperative. Context is important in determining if an imperative statement is emphatic.
A strongly worded directive or command that conveys the importance of doing something. In English, Hebrew and Greek, the imperative is a verb. In Greek, the spelling of the word indicates it is imperative. In English, imperatives are usually the first word in a sentence or phrase. For example, the phrase in Deuteronomy 30:19C which states, "Choose life in order that you may live, you and your descendants," is an imperative. Context is important in determining if an imperative statement is emphatic.
An element was intentionally removed from one of the two parts: e.g. A-B-C-D-D'-B'-A' where the C' is not provided. The absence only applies to imperfect chiastic and imperfect parallel symmetry structures. The absence emphasizes something is intentionally missing.
An emphasis or turning point that is at the logical center of a structure. It is either an X in the middle of a chiasm, parallel symmetry, immediate repetition, or list is a center point, or if two elements appear at the center of a chiasm rather than an X, those two elements are the center point. For example, X is the center point of A-B-C-X-A'-B'-C', and C-C' is the center point of A-B-C-C'-B'-A'.
A frame is the repetition of a theme near the beginning and end of a structure or substructure. The surrounding layer of a frame encapsulates an inner portion. Scholars often mention a similar concept called an inclusio or inclusion where the repetition may be confined to a literary unit or it may span multiple literary units. Both portions of the frame are required. The two frame elements often do not have the same words—instead, they have the same general theme and sometimes they are antithetical. Other related names for frames are bookends, brackets, and envelopes. Oftentimes the frame contains an emphatic statement.
A summarization that concludes a basic structure which is designated with the letters SUM. For example, A-B-C-A'-B'-C'-SUM. A closing summary is also known as a concluding epitome, final unit, and an epilogue. It serves two functions: to summarize and to motivate. It is always emphatic and should be easily detected.
In a chiasm, these are the two A elements: A-B-C-C'-B'-A'. Oftentimes an emphasis may be found in these locations.
An emphasis or turning point that is at the logical center of a structure. It is either an X in the middle of a chiasm, parallel symmetry, immediate repetition, or list is a center point, or if two elements appear at the center of a chiasm rather than an X, those two elements are the center point. For example, X is the center point of A-B-C-X-A'-B'-C', and C-C' is the center point of A-B-C-C'-B'-A'.
An opening or closing summarization that appears within a substructure. The schematic representation is the lowercase letters sum. This summarization may appear at the end of a substructure, a-b-x-a'-b'-sum, or at the beginning, sum-a-b-c-d. All the substructure summaries are emphatic.
This IMPERFECT PARALLEL SYMMETRY seems to follow a fairly regular beat A-B-C-A′-B′-no text-X-A′′-B′′-C′′ with very good correspondence. Some Bible translations consider verse 4:9 to be part of the regular A-B-C beat, and thereby let the reader believe there was only one set of twelve stones. The NASB 95 and other more literal translations help us see that there were two sets of twelve stones and that second set of stones has a special meaning.
- A elements identify who moved the stones
- B elements present the movement of the twelve stones
- C elements indicate where the twelve stones were placed
1) There is a CORRELATION OF SEQUENCES, A-B-C with A′-B′-no text and then with A′′-B′′-C′′, focus on twelve men with twelve stones. But verse 4:9 suggests one man, Joshua, with twelve hidden stones seems to be a picture that something is hidden in this story which should be revealed. Keep on reading: Why the twelve stones? Most of the commands are spoken in an IMPERATIVE voice.
2) The ABSENCE of text in the C′ position is between the first C carry command in verse 4:3B and the other carried declaration in verse 4:8C. All three C elements are in the LAST/LAST/LAST positions. It is possible that the C′ element was left out because it is an ellipsis: that is, not necessary to repeat. I suggest it was not necessary to repeat because it was an act of obedience. Without complaining, these stones were just as heavy then as they would be today.
3) The X CENTER POINT (verses 4:6 and 7) addresses the Why the twelve stones? QUESTION from the standpoint of the Israelites. The answer, to create a remembrance, could be viewed as what happened in the natural: a phenomenal heap of water (the river was at flood stage) caused the river to dry up. It must have been tremendous. But much more happened at the Jordan: the Israelites encountered the Lord in a positive, friendly, and protective manner. These people, who had lived in fear of the Lord, were now seeing Him in a totally different light.
4) Note in the CLOSING SUMMARY, verses 4:21 to 5:1, how the answer to that QUESTION Why the twelve stones? is different from the one in the center point. Both apply--it depends on your perspective. The answer here, that you may fear the Lord your God forever, is given to all people (verse 4:24). The chiasm substructure helps us see that the kings took that seriously. The SUBSTRUCTURE SUMMARY states that their hearts melted (which means they lost their courage) and their adverse spirits fled.
5) Why two piles of stones? The following is my discernment based on the two FRAME elements: verses 4:9 and 4:20. Scholars have developed other answers. I suggest that it is a picture of what happened to the hearts of the people. In the tabernacle, the Lord had been hidden in the ark by seven layers of roofing. As a result of their Jordan River experience, the ark was then revealed. In Exodus 19 and 20, the slaves trembled and feared the Lord. In the wilderness, the Lord brought harm and death to the rebellious. They got sick of the manna, the delicious quail turned sour, the land swallowed some rebels, people were stoned, so on and so on. Yes the hand of the Lord is mighty and is to be feared, but it gracious forever. They began to know what Moses heard on Mount Sinai, The Lord, the Lord God, compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in lovingkindness and truth Exodus 34:6. Show More Rhetoric Show Less Rhetoric
PARALLEL SYMMETRY (IMPERFECT):
... twelve stones were taken from the riverbed ...
an imperative
BEGINNING MARKER: “Now then, take for yourselves twelve men from the tribes of Israel, one man for each tribe. (v3:12)
STRUCTURE SPLIT:... verses 3:13 to 17 are not related to the twelve stones ...
... the Lord instructed Joshua regarding the twelve stones ...
a change of location
SUB-UNIT MARKER: Now when all the nation had finished crossing the Jordan, (v4:1A)
IMPERATIVE: take twelve men
A
the Lord spoke to Joshua, saying, “Take for yourselves twelve men from the people, one man from each tribe, (v4:1B,2)
IMPERATIVE: take twelve stones from riverbed
B
and command them, saying, ′Take up for yourselves twelve stones from here out of the middle of the Jordan, from the place where the priests′ feet are standing firm, (v4:3A)
IMPERATIVE: carry the stones to your lodging place
C
and carry them over with you and lay them down in the lodging place where you will lodge tonight.′” (v4:3B)
... Joshua instructed the twelve to get twelve stones ...
called twelve men
A′
So Joshua called the twelve men whom he had appointed from the sons of Israel, one man from each tribe; (v4:4)
IMPERATIVE: take your stone from the riverbed
B′
and Joshua said to them, “Cross again to the ark of the Lord your God into the middle of the Jordan, and each of you take up a stone on his shoulder, according to the number of the tribes of the sons of Israel. (v4:5)
ABSENCE: no further instruction
C′
QUESTION: so you will remember what the Lord has done forever
X
“Let this be a sign among you, so that when your children ask later, saying, ′What do these stones mean to you?′ then you shall say to them, ′Because the waters of the Jordan were cut off before the ark of the covenant of the Lord; when it crossed the Jordan, the waters of the Jordan were cut off.′ So these stones shall become a memorial to the sons of Israel forever.” (v4:6,7)
... the men took the twelve stones ...
twelve men obeyed
A′′
Thus the sons of Israel did as Joshua commanded, (v4:8A)
took twelve stones from riverbed
B′′
and took up twelve stones from the middle of the Jordan, just as the Lord spoke to Joshua, according to the number of the tribes of the sons of Israel; (v4:8B)
carried them to lodging place
C′′
and they carried them over with them to the lodging place and put them down there. (v4:8C)
... Joshua set up twelve additional stones ...
Joshua set up his twelve stones in the river
FRAME
Then Joshua set up twelve stones in the middle of the Jordan at the place where the feet of the priests who carried the ark of the covenant were standing, and they are there to this day. (v4:9)
STRUCTURE SPLIT:... suppressed: verses 4:10 to 18 about the crossing over ...
a change of location
SUB-UNIT MARKER: Now the people came up from the Jordan on the tenth of the first month and camped at Gilgal on the eastern edge of Jericho. (v4:19)
Joshua set up the tribe′s twelve stones at Gilgal
FRAME
Those twelve stones which they had taken from the Jordan, Joshua set up at Gilgal. (v4:20)
CLOSING SUMMARY: they crossed on dry ground
SUM
He said to the sons of Israel, “When your children ask their fathers in time to come, saying, ′What are these stones?′ then you shall inform your children, saying, ′Israel crossed this Jordan on dry ground.′ (v4:21,22)
dried up the waters
a
For the Lord your God dried up the waters of the Jordan before you until you had crossed, just as the Lord your God had done to the Red Sea, which He dried up before us until we had crossed; (v4:23)
all the people would know
b
that all the peoples of the earth may know that the hand of the Lord is mighty, (v4:24A)
so you may fear the Lord your God forever
x
so that you may fear the Lord your God forever.” (v4:24B)
the kings knew
b′
Now it came about when all the kings of the Amorites who were beyond the Jordan to the west, and all the kings of the Canaanites who were by the sea, (v5:1A)
dried up the waters
a′
heard how the Lord had dried up the waters of the Jordan before the sons of Israel until they had crossed, (v5:1B)
SUBSTRUCTURE SUMMARY: no courage or spirit in the kings
sum
that their hearts melted, and there was no spirit in them any longer because of the sons of Israel. (v5:1C)